Recently, many studies in the anthropological community have gradually found that our ancestors did not fare better after humans switched from hunting and gathering to farming. A large amount of archaeological evidence shows that the farming lifestyle not only takes more time and effort to cultivate, but also causes malnutrition due to the limited variety of crops. The higher density of flocks and the closeness to domesticated animals also lead to the frequent spread of infectious diseases, not to mention the subsequent wealth and poverty. Equalization and war killings, etc.
In contrast, Kano-gatherers seem to spend less time working, and there are no issues of inequality and gender exploitation. Anthropological studies of hunter-gatherer Bushmen have also reinforced this view to some extent. Then comes the big question: If farming life is so bad and hunter-gatherer life is so cool, why did our ancestors still ask for it? This is a big question, and whatsapp list we are still looking for the answer. Christian civilization has long tried to answer this question, which is the sin of Adam and Eve. What was life in the Garden of Eden like? The study of hunter-gatherers in Africa, Australia and South America by anthropologists seems to give us a picture of the Garden of Eden.
Schutzman's long-term field research in the Kalahari Desert found that their wealth in life is not in vain. There are many descriptions of their way of life in "Primitive Abundance", which is immersive, as if you can follow them like watching a documentary film. Animals, hunted and brought back to share with the tribe. But as an anthropologist, he doesn't look at it with a curious mind, but explores its rich cultural implications, and shows us that in the absence of clear land ownership, time, gender stereotypes and leadership, they How to interact and live in an orderly manner.